Should We Have Regulation For Enterprise AI App Builders?

Introduction

The rapid proliferation of Enterprise AI App Builders has fundamentally transformed how organizations approach digital transformation, enabling unprecedented automation and innovation across business processes. However, this technological revolution has also introduced complex regulatory challenges that demand immediate attention from policymakers, technologists, and business leaders. As enterprise systems become increasingly sophisticated and AI-powered applications touch every aspect of business operations—from Care Management and Hospital Management to Supply Chain Management and Case Management—the question of appropriate regulation has become more urgent than ever. The convergence of artificial intelligence with Low-Code Platforms and the emergence of Citizen Developers has created both remarkable opportunities and significant risks that require careful regulatory consideration.

The Current Regulatory Landscape and Enterprise AI

The regulatory environment for artificial intelligence has evolved rapidly, with the European Union leading the charge through the AI Act, which represents the world’s first comprehensive legal framework for AI regulation. This landmark legislation establishes a risk-based approach that categorizes AI systems into four distinct levels: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, and minimal or no risk. The Act’s significance extends beyond European borders, as it applies extraterritorially to all entities developing or deploying AI systems that affect EU citizens, regardless of where these companies are based.

Under the EU AI Act’s framework, many Enterprise AI applications fall into the high-risk category, particularly those used in critical business functions such as employment management, credit scoring, and essential private and public services. These high-risk systems must comply with strict obligations including adequate risk assessment, high-quality datasets, detailed documentation, and appropriate human oversight measures. The penalties for non-compliance are substantial, with fines reaching up to 7% of worldwide annual turnover or €35 million for prohibited AI systems.

For Enterprise Systems that incorporate AI capabilities, the regulatory implications are particularly significant. Business Enterprise Software that utilizes AI for decision-making processes – whether in Logistics Management, Transport Management, or Supplier Relationship Management – must now consider compliance requirements that extend far beyond traditional software regulations. The Act’s provisions for general-purpose AI models, which become effective in August 2025, will particularly impact organizations using large language models and foundation models in their enterprise computing solutions.

The Rise of Citizen Developers and Low-Code AI Platforms

The democratization of application development through Low-Code Platforms has created a new paradigm where Business Technologists and Citizen Developers can build sophisticated applications without traditional programming expertise. This transformation has been accelerated by AI integration, enabling non-technical users to create intelligent applications that incorporate complex automation logic and decision-making capabilities.

However, this democratization presents unique regulatory challenges. As highlighted in recent research, traditional governance practices built for software development don’t adapt well to AI-powered citizen development environments. The decentralized nature of citizen development means that AI-enabled applications are being created across organizations by individuals who may lack deep understanding of AI ethics, bias mitigation, or regulatory compliance requirements.

Modern AI app builders like DronaHQ and ToolJet are incorporating guardrails and governance features to address these concerns. These platforms embed controls into every layer of development, from frontend interfaces to backend workflows, ensuring that citizen-developed applications meet enterprise standards for security, compliance, and performance. Nevertheless, the rapid pace of innovation in this space often outpaces the development of appropriate governance frameworks.

The Enterprise Systems Group within organizations plays a crucial role in managing these challenges, serving as the custodian of enterprise architecture and systems portfolio. These groups must now extend their governance responsibilities to include AI-powered Low-Code Platforms and the applications created by Citizen Developers, ensuring alignment with both business strategy and regulatory requirements.

Risk Assessment and Industry-Specific Considerations

The need for regulation becomes particularly evident when examining industry-specific applications of Enterprise AI App Builders. In healthcare, for instance, AI governance frameworks have become essential for ensuring patient safety, maintaining ethical standards, and achieving regulatory compliance. Health systems across the United States have established comprehensive AI governance systems that include risk assessment protocols, ethical review processes, and continuous monitoring mechanisms.

Similar considerations apply to other regulated industries. In financial services, Enterprise AI applications used for credit scoring, fraud detection, and risk assessment fall under high-risk categories that require stringent compliance measures. The automation logic embedded in these systems can significantly impact individuals’ access to financial services, making transparent and accountable AI development crucial.

Supply Chain Management systems present another area of concern, where AI-powered algorithms make critical decisions about supplier selection, risk assessment, and resource allocation. The opacity of many AI models – often described as “black boxes” – raises questions about accountability and fairness in supply chain decisions that can affect global trade relationships and economic stability.

For Social Services applications, the stakes are particularly high. AI systems used in Ticket Management, Case Management, and other social service delivery mechanisms can directly impact vulnerable populations’ access to essential services. The EU AI Act specifically addresses these concerns by categorizing many social service AI applications as high-risk, requiring comprehensive documentation, bias testing, and human oversight.

Enterprise Business Architecture and AI Governance

Effective regulation of Enterprise AI App Builders must consider the broader context of Enterprise Business Architecture and how AI systems integrate with existing enterprise products and Enterprise Resource Systems. The interconnected nature of modern Enterprise Software means that AI applications rarely operate in isolation – they typically interact with Enterprise Resource Planning systems, customer databases, and other critical business infrastructure.

This interconnectedness creates both opportunities and challenges for regulation. On one hand, it enables comprehensive monitoring and governance of AI systems across the enterprise. On the other hand, it means that poorly governed AI applications can have cascading effects throughout an organization’s technology ecosystem.

The concept of technology transfer becomes particularly relevant in this context, as organizations must carefully manage how AI capabilities are shared and implemented across different business units and applications. Enterprise Systems Groups must coordinate not only the technical aspects of AI deployment but also ensure that governance frameworks scale appropriately across diverse use cases and risk profiles.

ModelOp’s approach to AI governance illustrates how comprehensive platforms can address these challenges by providing a single source of truth for all AI initiatives across an enterprise. Such platforms enable organizations to maintain visibility into the risks, performance, health, and value of all AI systems while enforcing compliance policies at scale.

Open-Source Considerations and Innovation Balance

The regulation of Enterprise AI App Builders must carefully balance innovation promotion with risk mitigation, particularly regarding open-source AI development. The EU AI Act’s treatment of open-source AI systems has created regulatory complexity, as the law makes no exceptions for open-source systems when it comes to bans on unacceptable risk AI or restrictions on high-risk applications.

This approach has significant implications for the Enterprise AI ecosystem, where many successful AI applications are built upon open-source foundations. Organizations using open-source AI models in their Enterprise Computing Solutions must now navigate complex compliance requirements that may not align with traditional open-source development practices.

The challenge is particularly acute for business software solutions that incorporate open-source AI components. While the EU AI Act excludes open-source AI from some obligations under certain limited conditions, these exclusions are narrow and may not cover many enterprise use cases. This creates uncertainty for organizations seeking to leverage open-source AI while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Implementation Framework for AI App Builder Regulation

Based on the analysis of current regulatory trends and industry best practices, several key principles should guide the regulation of Enterprise AI App Builders. First, regulations should adopt a risk-based approach similar to the EU AI Act, recognizing that different applications pose varying levels of risk and should be regulated accordingly.

For high-risk Enterprise AI applications – particularly those used in Hospital Management, Care Management, and other critical services – regulations should require comprehensive governance frameworks that include risk assessment, bias testing, human oversight, and continuous monitoring. These frameworks should be integrated into the organization’s broader Enterprise Business Architecture to ensure consistency and effectiveness.

Second, regulations should address the unique challenges posed by Citizen Developers and Low-Code Platforms. This includes requirements for platform providers to implement appropriate guardrails, provide AI literacy training, and maintain audit trails of AI-powered applications developed by non-technical users. The Enterprise Systems Group should be empowered with clear authority and responsibility for overseeing citizen-developed AI applications.

Third, regulations should promote transparency and explainability in AI decision-making, particularly for systems that affect individuals’ access to services or opportunities. This is especially critical for Enterprise AI applications used in employment decisions, credit scoring, and social service delivery.

Technology Governance and Future Considerations

The rapid evolution of AI technology requires regulatory frameworks that can adapt to changing circumstances while maintaining consistent principles. As AI Assistance becomes more sophisticated and integrated into core business processes, regulations must evolve to address new risks and opportunities.

The emergence of AI-powered automation logic in Enterprise Systems creates new categories of decision-making that may require regulatory oversight. Organizations must implement governance frameworks that can manage these automated decisions while ensuring accountability and transparency.

For specialized applications such as Hospital Management and Logistics Management, sector-specific regulations may be necessary to address unique risks and requirements. These regulations should complement general AI governance frameworks while providing targeted guidance for industry-specific use cases.

Conclusion

The question of whether to regulate Enterprise AI App Builders is not whether regulation is needed, but rather how to implement effective regulation that promotes innovation while protecting against risks. The current regulatory landscape, led by the EU AI Act, provides a foundation for comprehensive AI governance that addresses the unique challenges posed by Enterprise AI applications.

Effective regulation must address the democratization of AI development through Low-Code Platforms and Citizen Developers while ensuring that Enterprise Systems maintain appropriate governance and oversight. This requires a collaborative approach involving Enterprise Systems Groups, Business Technologists, and regulatory authorities to develop frameworks that balance innovation with accountability.

The stakes are particularly high for critical applications in Healthcare Management, Supply Chain Management, and Social Services, where AI decisions can significantly impact individuals and communities. Comprehensive regulation that addresses these concerns while promoting continued innovation in Enterprise Computing Solutions will be essential for realizing the full potential of AI in enterprise environments.

Organizations should proactively implement AI governance frameworks that anticipate regulatory requirements while fostering innovation in business software solutions and enterprise products. By taking a forward-looking approach to AI governance, enterprises can ensure that their digital transformation initiatives remain both innovative and compliant in an increasingly regulated environment.

References: